Manager’s Insight: Navigating Team Development in the Remote Work Era

Navigating the nuances of remote work requires not just an understanding of technology but a deep dive into the dynamics of team development and culture. Traditional team-building models are being tested and transformed in today's rapidly evolving digital workplace.

Susan Wheelan suggested that groups achieve maturity simply by working together. She claims a significant relationship exists between the length of time that a group has been together and their behavioral patterns. She describes these relationships using a four-stage model based on a life-growth cycle.
‍

Is this model still valid for remote work companies? Although this model was initially developed for face-to-face teams, the core concept remains valid and applies to remote teams. These stages offer a framework for understanding remote teams' challenges and opportunities as they mature and work together.

Let's apply Wheelan's model to a remote work environment.

Infancy Stage. A new remote project team is formed with members from various locations. Initially, there’s uncertainty about roles and expectations. Team members are polite, and conversations are mostly superficial, focusing on logistics and schedules.

This stage allows us to inquire:

• How can we clearly define and communicate the roles and responsibilities of each team member?
• What communication tools and platforms will best support our team’s needs, and how do we establish norms for their use?
• How do we establish trust among team members who may have never met in person?

Adolescence. As team members start to work together, differences in working styles and opinions emerge, leading to conflicts. There’s a struggle over leadership, methods, and processes.

This stage allows us to inquire:

• How can we ensure all team members feel heard and valued despite differences in opinions and working styles?
• How can we better define and clarify team roles and processes to reduce confusion and overlap?
• How do we balance the need for leadership with the importance of empowering each team member to take initiative and leadership in their areas of expertise?

Adulthood. Through effective communication and problem-solving, the team starts to build trust. Roles and responsibilities become clearer, and the team establishes norms for working together efficiently.

This stage allows us to inquire:

• How do we ensure clear and effective communication continues as the team evolves?
• In what ways can we encourage ongoing professional development and learning within the team?
• How do we ensure that the team’s goals and objectives continue to align with the broader organizational strategy?

Maturity. The team reaches a level of high efficiency and flexibility. Members are deeply committed to the project goals and work collaboratively to solve problems and innovate.

This stage allows us to inquire:

• How can we continue to innovate and stay ahead of changes in our industry or field?
• How do we maintain high motivation and engagement among team members to prevent burnout?
• How do we ensure that our team remains adaptable and can quickly pivot in response to unexpected challenges?

Many interpreters of this have assumed that a group becomes effective as it progresses through the stages. Although this assumption may be generally accurate, what makes a group effective is more complex than this model acknowledges.

The absence of war does not necessarily mean that there is peace. When team members say there are no issues, it does not necessarily imply that there are no issues. It could also mean they are hesitant to share their thoughts or ideas due to a lack of trust, fear of criticism or blame from their colleagues, or an unsafe work environment. Silence may indicate an underlying conflict. To address this issue, creating a safe work environment where everyone can voice their opinions without fear of negative repercussions is essential. This can promote trust and collaboration, leading to a healthier and more productive work environment. Here are some additional insights to help address this issue:

1. Active Listening: One-on-one meetings offer a dedicated space to truly listen to your team members' concerns, ideas, and feedback. This fosters a sense of trust and allows you to better understand their perspectives.
2. Safe Space for Feedback: Creating a safe and supportive environment can minimize the fear of public criticism. Team members can feel comfortable sharing honest feedback without worrying about public humiliation.
3. Building Trust Through Casual Conversation: Going beyond work-related topics, like chatting about things you might discuss by the water cooler, helps build rapport and trust with your team. Sharing random ideas or news can create a more personal connection and a sense of shared humanity.

Remote work introduces new challenges specific to communication and relationship building. In a remote setting, intentional communication and clear expectations are vital during the first and second stages. That is why it is essential to design a cohesive onboarding process and feedback from the management team to overcome the distance barrier.

Cultural barriers can add another layer of complexity to team development models in remote work companies. Teams with members from different cultural backgrounds might have different communication styles that can lead to misunderstandings during initial introductions and information sharing.

Erin Meyer's article highlights that researchers Nisbett and Masuda explored cultural differences in visual attention through a clever experiment. Participants from Japan and the United States watched short animated videos of underwater scenes.

What they saw differed dramatically:

• American Focus: Americans tended to describe the foreground, mentioning larger, faster-moving, and brightly colored objects like prominent fish.
• Japanese Focus: Japanese participants, however, focused more on the background details. They reported seeing more minor elements, like the frog in the bottom left corner. Interestingly, they also talked twice as much about the relationships between objects in the foreground and background, suggesting a more holistic view of the scene.

This study highlights how cultural background can influence how we perceive and describe the visual world. Americans prioritized prominent objects, while the Japanese paid closer attention to the broader context and connections within the scene.

Modern workplaces, remote work, and advanced technologies are all hallmarks of our interconnected world. While these advancements offer incredible opportunities, they also introduce new challenges, particularly around cultural barriers in team collaboration.

The good news is that by acknowledging these complexities, companies can unlock the immense potential of diverse teams. Companies can cultivate a more inclusive and collaborative remote work environment by fostering intercultural awareness, establishing clear communication guidelines, and leveraging technology that bridges cultural divides.

‍